Jump to content

chartpolski

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    14,173

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    150

 Content Type 

Everything posted by chartpolski

  1. chartpolski
    Andy Burnham has broke with the Labour Party and demanded an inquiry. I wonder if he will be accused of “jumping on a far right bandwagon “ ? Cheers.
  2. chartpolski
    I despise the Tory’s and Labour equally. I think I’ve made my point, comprehensively, why I’d like an independent inquiry. Have you not read the court transcripts that have come out in the last few days ? Information that had to be dragged out by F.O.I. requests. I know you like to take the opposite view to the general consensus, probably to get a rise, a bite , a wind up, I’ve replied , I think, courteously and honestly, but I think it’s far to serious an affair to be the subject of a wind up, so I’ll bow out now. Cheers.
  3. chartpolski
    As I said, the Jay inquiry barely touched on Pakistani grooming gangs, and it has since come to light that it’s far more widespread than thought when Jay did her inquiry. What I and many more would like is an independent inquiry focused solely on this aspect of child rape and who covered it up. It wouldn’t cost billions, that’s an exaggeration, of course the Jay inquiry was vastly expensive, £200 million and took seven years, but an independent inquiry that’s being asked for now would be far more focused and would be cheaper and quicker, although cost shouldn’t come into it when protectin
  4. chartpolski
    How would an independent inquiry derail the Schools Bill , they are completely separate. Or are you talking about the Jay inquiry which is long finished and her recommendations are finally if belatedly being implemented. The schools bill is to reorganise the education system, nothing to do with grooming gangs. The Jay inquiry was a wide ranging inquiry into child abuse focusing on Saville, Cyril Smith, the Church, the BBC etc and hardly mentioned grooming gangs. People want an inquiry into the grooming/rape scandal as they are finally getting information from court transcripts e
  5. chartpolski
    The amendment to the Schools bill was the nuclear option to force the Labour government into granting a national independent inquiry into specifically Pakistani grooming gangs. If Starmer had granted that inquiry the amendment would have been dropped. He refused and put his MP’s on a three line whip meaning anyone who didn’t vote against the amendment would be thrown out of the Labour Party. Now it appears HE didn’t vote against it, he ABSTAINED ! Why ? Well the only reason I can think of is when anyone accused him of voting against an inquiry he can say he DIDN’T vot
  6. chartpolski
    Newkid is one of the good guys… Cheers.
  7. chartpolski

    The Bible.

    chartpolski replied to Goly's topic in General Talk

    Have you read “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail , Scotty mate ? I was quite intrigued by it years ago, and the Tom Hanks films are based on it. It basically postulates that the French Morovingian dynasty was the bloodline of Jesus and that the secret society of The Priory de Zion held proof of this. The Catholic Church did everything they could to debunk and ridicule this, but it is very thought provoking, even for a non- conspiracy theorist like me ! LOL ! Cheers.
  8. chartpolski
    Starmer put a “three line whip” on his MP’s, meaning if they voted FOR an inquiry they would be thrown out of the Labour Party, but now it’s being reported that Starmer ABSTAINED from voting ! What a duplicitous coward….. Cheers.
  9. chartpolski
    Maybe I see it differently to you because I’m an old man. I was a Labour voter when Labour was the party for the working man, the pensioner, the poor. But now I see they have abandoned us and court the votes of the Muslim, the immigrant, and have just, in a vote in Parliament, sided with Pakistani rape gangs who raped , tortured and murdered white, working class, poor children……exactly the people Labour were supposed to care for. Forget the Tory’s; they have never cared for us, but this Labour Party are acting AGAINST us. How any right thinking person could ever vote Labour a
  10. chartpolski
    The Tory’s are disgraceful, but it was LABOUR councillors and MP’s that were complicit in the cover ups. When Labour MP Dunsczak complained, the Labour Party Chairman, Dobbins, and another senior Labour MP told him not to mention the ethnicity of the rapists as “ IT WOULD COST THEM VOTES” ! Labour are evil, they have no honour whatsoever, neither do the Tory’s, but tonight Labour could have done the honourable thing and voted for an inquiry but put their lust for power above the safety of our children and voted AGAINST an inquiry. I am beyond angry, if a Labour canvasser called at
  11. chartpolski
    That should say “British LABOUR MP’s vote against a national inquiry “. Cheers.
  12. chartpolski
    That was the grey strip I think, never used again. Cheers.
  13. chartpolski

    The Bible.

    chartpolski replied to Goly's topic in General Talk

    I guess it depends on which bible you read and follow. The Old Testament with its vengeful, angry God who tormented Job just for a bet with the devil, who turned Lots wife to stone, who believed in a tooth for a tooth, an eye for an eye, who destroyed the whole of man kind apart from one chosen family. Or the New Testament with its kind and loving God who gave his only begotten son to save mankind, who said love thy neighbour, turn the other cheek, forgave those who crucified his son. A lot of contradictions between the two books of the bible. Cheers.
  14. chartpolski
    Arteta has blamed the Puma footballs that were used……..strange , I was sure Newcastle were playing with the same footballs as Arsenal ? Cheers.
  15. chartpolski
    You bring joy to my heart young friend , and I feel my work has not been in vain ! Cheers.
  16. chartpolski
    Can we be the 52nd please ? Cheers.
  17. chartpolski
    I want you to aim higher mate; a Doctorate from the University of Life should be achievable if you buckle down to your studies ! Cheers.
  18. chartpolski
    Every evening I ask my wife, what is the itinerary for tomorrow pet ? Before she answers I tell her not to forget that I’ll be out at first light with the dogs, then home for breakfast, then I’ll be at the allotment sorting out the poultry , getting things ready for the spring, etc, then I’ll be home for lunch. Then I’ve got to go for dog food and to the feed merchants for hen food. Then take the dogs out again, then jet wash the kennels, then it’s tea time. In the evening I’ll be watching football/snooker/darts on the tv in the man cave or out lamping and then back for supper.
  19. chartpolski
    HALF TERM REPORT: Can do better. Must pay more attention. Cheers.
  20. chartpolski
    There’s an incredibly stupid woman on tv right now having a go at TR and she had to be stopped as she had the videos and court cases he was given the contempt court charge for completely mixed up . She said he was jailed for showing the video that could of compromised the grooming gang trial, it wasn’t, it was for the video of the Syrian lad, but hey, why let the truth get in the way of your far left views ? Cheers.
  21. chartpolski
    Yeah, I’m not saying Robinson was right or wrong, but I’ve heard a few people on tv saying you can’t go to prison for a civil case, maybe you can’t , maybe you can, but he was found guilty in a civil case and had to pay damages, the judge issued a court order telling him to take down the video and not show it again or he would be in contempt of a court order. Robinson ignored the court order and was charged with contempt of court. He pleaded guilty to the charge, and the sentence for that is up to two years in jail, wether the contempt charge was linked to a civil or criminal case. N
  22. chartpolski
    Not quite correct , Scotty mate; being found guilty in a civil case doesn’t, usually , result in jail, but contempt of court, in both civil and criminal cases, has a maximum sentence of two years jail. Robinson was found guilt of contempt of court. Cheers.
  23. chartpolski
    The Jay report was about child abuse in general, it included the likes of Saville, the church etc. Pakistani grooming gangs were barely mentioned. We need an inquiry into specifically Pakistani grooming gangs and the people and services and institutions that colluded in the cover ups. It looks like Starmer is loathe to sanction this as the councillors and MP’s were predominantly Labour. Cheets.
  24. chartpolski
    I hope you have deleted your search history after looking for Dwarf black women images ? LOL ! Cheers.
  25. chartpolski
    You sir, are “a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma”…. Apologies to Sir Winston. Cheers.
×
×
  • Create New...