Sustainable1982

I hear what you are saying about the lenses. Part of my reasoning behind my proposed switch is that the overall size/weight of my kit can be reduced without sacrificing quality. The Fuji lens range is of an excellent standard by all accounts. I'll give it some further thought though.

A reasonable amount. But it could easily be traded in against a Fujifilm X-Range system at a decent rate. What is your personal opinion on the X-Range?

Thanks for the constructive input Mega.

Hi folks, I have been a Nikon user for as long as I have been shooting, since back in the days of film. I've always found the Nikon system (I generally used the semi-pro models) very flexible, robust and responsive, perfect for shooting wildlife. However, I am becoming increasingly drawn by the "Mirrorless Camera" phenomena and I am seriously considering a change in system. My question is this: is the Fujifilm X-Range (the mirrorless system that has drawn my eye) suited to wildlife photography? I have heard varying reports on the responsiveness of their auto-focus, which of course could pr

Something from the southern hemisphere

Thanks it's called fusion and I use the free one. (google fusion hdr). You take 3 photos, one over exposed one under exposed and one just about right and it stitches them together. The good thing is they don't have to be on a tripod. can you just duplicate the one photo? That can be done. It is known as Pseudo-HDR. But the results tend to look very unnatural. It is better to take multiple exposures. The greater the dynamic range (contrast) the more exposures you should take. But 3 is obviously the minimum.